The Bible (Letter 7)



Sir Tom,

SMASH!

I think your 3 points are really the formation of, in terms of a backbone, the episode.

I’m not sure how we tackle point 1 without tackling society’s philosophy. A greater issue as postmodernism/subjectivism is not a philosophy that is overt. Our generation(s?) and younger would not admit (or ever think about) that they hold to a philosophy of any kind. Ergo, it’s tough to get them to change it. The other issue there is that people don’t like being told what to do, or, more so, what to do and how to do it.

I think that’s it! Not reliability, but relevance. As we talk through what the Bible is we need to show that it’s still relevant. A subjective generation will still take on things they feel are relevant to them.

Point 3 is very interesting, isn’t it. As with point 1 it’s hard to get Christians to understand this because they don’t see it. If you told them they worshiped the Bible, they would simply disagree and say they use the Bible to worship God. This is something I hope to discuss on this month’s Stuff Podcast (also on the Bible!).

Point 2 is linked into the question of how we read the Bible. Can we really take it all as words from God or does it make more sense as a handbook? As you say it’s complex and sometimes baffling. Again this is more the realms of the Stuff podcast, but it is good to have in our minds. I think for us the question is of purpose. What do we (or perhaps should we) use the Bible for?

If someone is listening to the podcast to grasp the fundamentals of the faith, then what part does the Bible play? How can it help us in our faith and in our life? Is it still relevant or outdated?

It vexes me because to question inerrancy is basically to question Christianity in it’s present form. To reshape theology as we know it. That’s a big call. Are we up to it? Should we be doing it?

Just a note on whether we question parts of the Bible that do not gel with God’s character. I think this is dangerous as it relies on our understanding of God’s character which is very limited. We must remember that we have no place to cry unjust or unfair; God can do what He likes with His creations in the same way we can build and destroy anything we want when we play with Lego. It is not for the bricks to decide.

Peace

D

 


10 thoughts on “The Bible (Letter 7)

  1. I’d like to withdraw $100, please http://porntubehub.online beeg It’s a state of affairs that the capital has endured since the 1930s, when Jimmy Stewart got off the train at Union Station in “Mr Smith Goes to Washington” and came face-to-face with the dark side of US politics.

  2. I came here to work https://beeg.x.fc2.com/ cliphunter Bezos does not attend these meetings. He spends more time on Amazon’s newer businesses, such as Amazon Web Services, the streaming video and music initiatives, and, in particular, the Kindle and Kindle Fire efforts. (Executives joke darkly that employees can’t even pass gas in the Kindle buildings without the CEO’s permission.) But Bezos can always make his presence felt anywhere in the company.

  3. Looking for work https://beeg.x.fc2.com/thumbzilla.html xnxx Possibly, a deal can be cut with these hackers. Who better to design a lock; than a burglar? Seriously; anybody remember “Operation Paperclip?” (Look it up on the ‘Net!) Some of the worst of the German Nazis saved the American bacon. (While Dr. Oppenheimer – “Father of the [American] Atomic Bomb” – was sacked as a God-hated “Communist!”) Funny, how life works.

  4. What’s your number? https://beeg.x.fc2.com/eporner.html xvideos Speaking to reporters at the White House, Obama stressed that mail would be delivered and Social Security payments would be made, but warned that national monuments would close immediately to tourists, government office buildings would close and veteran centers would lack staff if a shutdown took place.

  5. Could I borrow your phone, please? http://tubearchive.online/hqporner.html iwank Again, the offense managed only one run, so by the time the Royals broke it open with a pair of runs in the ninth, there wasn’t a soul left in the Bronx – well, one not named Girardi, anyway – that honestly believed the Yankees were going to overcome a 3-1 deficit.

Leave a Reply

*